Pinecone vs Neo4j: Selecting the Right Database for GenAI Applications
As AI-driven applications evolve, the importance of vector search capabilities in supporting these advancements cannot be overstated. This blog post will discuss two prominent databases with vector search capabilities: Pinecone and Neo4j. Each provides robust capabilities for handling vector search, an essential feature for applications such as recommendation engines, image retrieval, and semantic search. Our goal is to provide developers and engineers with a clear comparison, aiding in the decision of which database best aligns with their specific requirements.
What is a Vector Database?
Before we compare Pinecone vs Neo4j, let's first explore the concept of vector databases.
A vector database is specifically designed to store and query high-dimensional vectors, which are numerical representations of unstructured data. These vectors encode complex information, such as the semantic meaning of text, the visual features of images, or product attributes. By enabling efficient similarity searches, vector databases play a pivotal role in AI applications, allowing for more advanced data analysis and retrieval.
Common use cases for vector databases include e-commerce product recommendations, content discovery platforms, anomaly detection in cybersecurity, medical image analysis, and natural language processing (NLP) tasks. They also play a crucial role in Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG), a technique that enhances the performance of large language models (LLMs) by providing external knowledge to reduce issues like AI hallucinations.
There are many types of vector databases available in the market, including:
- Purpose-built vector databases such as Milvus, Zilliz Cloud (fully managed Milvus)
- Vector search libraries such as Faiss and Annoy.
- Lightweight vector databases such as Chroma and Milvus Lite.
- Traditional databases with vector search add-ons capable of performing small-scale vector searches.
Pinecone is a purpose-built vector database and Neo4j is a graph database with vector search as an add-on. This post compares their vector search capabilities.
Pinecone: The Basics
Pinecone is a SaaS built for vector search in machine learning applications. As a managed service, Pinecone handles the infrastructure so you can focus on building applications not databases. It’s a scalable platform for storing and querying large amounts of vector embeddings for tasks like semantic search and recommendation systems.
Key features of Pinecone include real-time updates, machine learning model compatibility and a proprietary indexing technique that makes vector search fast even with billions of vectors. Namespaces allow you to divide records within an index for faster queries and multitenancy. Pinecone also supports metadata filtering, so you can add context to each record and filter search results for speed and relevance.
Pinecone’s serverless offering makes database management easy and includes efficient data ingestion methods. One of the features is the ability to import data from object storage, which is very cost effective for large scale data ingestion. This uses an asynchronous long running operation to import and index data stored as Parquet files.
To improve search Pinecone hosts the multilanguage-e5-large model for vector generation and has a two stage retrieval process with reranking using the bge-reranker-v2-m3 model. Pinecone also supports hybrid search which combines dense and sparse vector embeddings to balance semantic understanding with keyword matching. With integration into popular machine learning frameworks, multiple language support and auto scaling Pinecone is a complete solution for vector search in AI applications with both performance and ease of use.
Neo4j: The Basics
Neo4j’s vector search allows developers to create vector indexes to search for similar data across their graph. These indexes work with node properties that contain vector embeddings - numerical representations of data like text, images or audio that capture the meaning of the data. The system supports vectors up to 4096 dimensions and cosine and Euclidean similarity functions.
The implementation uses Hierarchical Navigable Small World (HNSW) graphs to do fast approximate k-nearest neighbor searches. When querying a vector index, you specify how many neighbors you want to retrieve and the system returns matching nodes ordered by similarity score. These scores are 0-1 with higher being more similar. The HNSW approach works well by keeping connections between similar vectors and allowing the system to quickly jump to different parts of the vector space.
Creating and using vector indexes is done through the query language. You can create indexes with the CREATE VECTOR INDEX command and specify parameters like vector dimensions and similarity function. The system will validate that only vectors of the configured dimensions are indexed. Querying these indexes is done with the db.index.vector.queryNodes procedure which takes an index name, number of results and query vector as input.
Neo4j’s vector indexing has performance optimizations like quantization which reduces memory usage by compressing the vector representations. You can tune the index behavior with parameters like max connections per node (M) and number of nearest neighbors tracked during insertion (ef_construction). While these parameters allow you to balance between accuracy and performance, the defaults work well for most use cases. The system also supports relationship vector indexes from version 5.18, so you can search for similar data on relationship properties.
This allows developers to build AI powered applications. By combining graph queries with vector similarity search applications can find related data based on semantic meaning not exact matches. For example a movie recommendation system could use plot embedding vectors to find similar movies, while using the graph structure to ensure the recommendations come from the same genre or era as the user prefers.
Key Differences
When building applications that need vector search capabilities, Pinecone and Neo4j offer different approaches. Let's compare them across key areas to help you make an informed decision.
Search Technology and Performance
Pinecone uses a purpose-built vector search engine optimized for machine learning applications. It handles vector similarity searches using proprietary indexing that works efficiently even with billions of vectors.
Neo4j takes a different approach by implementing vector search through HNSW (Hierarchical Navigable Small World) graphs. This method works by creating connections between similar vectors, supporting vectors up to 4096 dimensions. While both systems handle similarity search well, Pinecone's specialized architecture might give it an edge for pure vector search operations.
Data Management Capabilities
Pinecone excels at managing vector embeddings and associated metadata. It organizes data using namespaces, which help partition records for better query performance. The system handles real-time updates well and includes features for efficient data ingestion, including direct imports from object storage.
Neo4j shines when you need to combine vector search with graph relationships. It can store vectors as node properties and create indexes for similarity search, while also maintaining the complex relationships between data points. This makes Neo4j particularly useful when your application needs both vector similarity and graph traversal capabilities.
Scaling and Performance
Pinecone offers automatic scaling as a managed service. You don't need to worry about infrastructure management - the system handles scaling based on your needs. It maintains fast query performance even as data volumes grow.
Neo4j requires more hands-on management for scaling. While it provides tools and strategies for handling large datasets, you'll need to plan and implement scaling solutions yourself unless using their managed cloud service.
Integration Options
Pinecone integrates well with machine learning frameworks and includes built-in support for popular embedding models. It offers a two-stage retrieval process with reranking and supports hybrid search combining dense and sparse embeddings.
Neo4j integrates naturally with graph-based applications and traditional databases. Its vector search capabilities work alongside its graph database features, making it useful for applications that need both semantic similarity and relationship-based queries.
Setup and Management
Pinecone wins on ease of setup - as a managed service, you can start using it quickly without complex configuration. The system handles infrastructure management, updates, and scaling automatically.
Neo4j requires more initial setup and ongoing maintenance, particularly if self-hosted. You'll need to configure vector indexes, tune parameters like connections per node, and manage the database infrastructure yourself.
Cost Structure
Pinecone prices based on the number of vectors stored and queries performed. The serverless offering provides flexible scaling, but costs can increase with usage.
Neo4j's pricing depends on your deployment choice - self-hosted installations have infrastructure costs, while their cloud service prices based on resource usage. You might find Neo4j more cost-effective if you're already using it as your primary database.
When to Choose Each Technology
Pinecone is the right choice when your application focuses primarily on vector similarity search and needs minimal setup and maintenance. It works best for teams building AI applications that require fast, scalable vector search without managing infrastructure. The system shines in use cases like semantic document search, recommendation engines, or image similarity search where you need to handle millions or billions of vectors efficiently. Pinecone also makes sense when you need real-time updates and want built-in features like hybrid search and reranking without extra configuration.
Neo4j becomes the clear winner when your application needs to combine vector similarity with complex relationship analysis. It's ideal for scenarios where you want to enhance traditional graph queries with semantic understanding - like finding similar products while considering purchase history relationships, or discovering related research papers based on both citation networks and content similarity. Neo4j also works well when you need fine-grained control over your search infrastructure or when you're already using Neo4j's graph capabilities and want to add vector search features.
Conclusion
Your choice between Pinecone and Neo4j should align with your specific technical needs and team capabilities. Pinecone offers a managed, specialized vector search service that's easy to set up and scale, making it perfect for teams that want to focus on building applications rather than managing infrastructure. Neo4j provides a powerful combination of graph and vector capabilities, ideal for applications that need both relationship analysis and semantic search. Consider your use case requirements, data structure needs, and whether you need pure vector search or a combination of vector and graph capabilities when making your decision.
Read this to get an overview of Pinecone and Neo4j but to evaluate these you need to evaluate based on your use case. One tool that can help with that is VectorDBBench, an open-source benchmarking tool for vector database comparison. In the end, thorough benchmarking with your own datasets and query patterns will be key to making a decision between these two powerful but different approaches to vector search in distributed database systems.
Using Open-source VectorDBBench to Evaluate and Compare Vector Databases on Your Own
VectorDBBench is an open-source benchmarking tool for users who need high-performance data storage and retrieval systems, especially vector databases. This tool allows users to test and compare different vector database systems like Milvus and Zilliz Cloud (the managed Milvus) using their own datasets and find the one that fits their use cases. With VectorDBBench, users can make decisions based on actual vector database performance rather than marketing claims or hearsay.
VectorDBBench is written in Python and licensed under the MIT open-source license, meaning anyone can freely use, modify, and distribute it. The tool is actively maintained by a community of developers committed to improving its features and performance.
Download VectorDBBench from its GitHub repository to reproduce our benchmark results or obtain performance results on your own datasets.
Take a quick look at the performance of mainstream vector databases on the VectorDBBench Leaderboard.
Read the following blogs to learn more about vector database evaluation.
Further Resources about VectorDB, GenAI, and ML
Chloe WilliamsChloe Williams is a technical writer at Zilliz.
- What is a Vector Database?
- Pinecone: The Basics
- Neo4j: The Basics
- Key Differences
- When to Choose Each Technology
- Conclusion
- Using Open-source VectorDBBench to Evaluate and Compare Vector Databases on Your Own
- Further Resources about VectorDB, GenAI, and ML
Content
Start Free, Scale Easily
Try the fully-managed vector database built for your GenAI applications.
Try Zilliz Cloud for FreeThe Definitive Guide to Choosing a Vector Database
Overwhelmed by all the options? Learn key features to look for & how to evaluate with your own data. Choose with confidence.