Blog
Vector Databases vs. Document Databases

Vector Databases vs. Document Databases

Mar 14, 202517 min read

Introduction

Vector databases excel at storing and querying high-dimensional vectors, enabling AI-driven applications to find semantic similarities that traditional query methods simply cannot detect. Document databases shine in their ability to store semi-structured data in flexible, JSON-like formats, making them ideal for applications with evolving schemas and nested data structures.

But here's where things get interesting: as applications increasingly need both semantic understanding and flexible document storage, the lines between these database types are blurring. Document databases are adding vector capabilities, while vector databases are enhancing their ability to store and query document metadata alongside embeddings.

For developers and architects building applications in 2025, understanding when to use each database type—and when they might complement each other—has become crucial for creating systems that can effectively handle both traditional document operations and modern AI-powered functionality.

Today's Database Landscape: Specialization Reigns

Remember when we defaulted to relational databases for nearly every use case? Those days are behind us. Today's data landscape has evolved into a rich ecosystem of specialized solutions, each optimized for specific data types and access patterns.

In this increasingly specialized landscape:

Relational databases continue to excel at transactional workloads with structured relationships
Key-value stores provide blazing-fast simple data access
Graph databases make relationship-heavy data queryable and traversable
Time series databases efficiently handle chronological data for monitoring and analytics
Wide-column stores manage massive structured datasets across distributed clusters

Vector databases and document databases represent two of the most important categories in modern application architecture:

Vector databases have emerged as essential infrastructure for AI-powered applications, effectively bridging the gap between models that generate embeddings and applications that need to efficiently query them. The explosive growth in generative AI and semantic search has made them increasingly central to modern applications.
Document databases revolutionized web application development by accommodating flexible, nested data structures without predefined schemas. They've become the backbone of countless applications that require agility in data modeling and scale.

What makes this comparison particularly relevant is the growing number of applications that need both capabilities—from content management systems with semantic search to e-commerce platforms with personalized recommendations based on product descriptions.

Why You Might Be Deciding Between These Database Types

If you're reading this, you're likely facing one of these scenarios:

You're building an AI-enhanced application with document storage needs: Perhaps you're developing a content management system that needs both flexible document storage and semantic search capabilities.
You're adding AI capabilities to an existing document-based application: Maybe you already have a MongoDB application and want to add vector search for more intelligent queries.
You're optimizing for developer productivity and infrastructure costs: With limited resources, you're trying to determine whether a single database or specialized databases will deliver the most value.
You're evaluating hybrid approaches: You're wondering if a document database with vector capabilities could meet your needs or if you need separate, specialized systems.
You're future-proofing your architecture: You want an approach that will scale with both your document storage and AI needs as your application evolves.

As someone who's built and scaled applications using both database types, I can tell you that making the right choice requires understanding not just their core strengths, but also how their architectural differences impact real-world applications.

Vector Databases: The Backbone of Modern AI Search

Architectural Foundations

At their core, vector databases like Milvus and Zilliz Cloud revolve around a powerful concept: representing data items as points in high-dimensional space where proximity equals similarity. Their architecture typically includes:

Vector storage engines optimized for dense numerical arrays that can range from dozens to thousands of dimensions
ANN (Approximate Nearest Neighbor) indexes like HNSW, IVF, or PQ that make billion-scale vector search practical
Distance computation optimizations for calculating similarity using metrics like cosine, Euclidean, or dot product
Filtering subsystems that combine vector search with metadata constraints
Sharding mechanisms designed specifically for distributing vector workloads

The key insight: vector databases sacrifice the perfect accuracy of exact nearest neighbor search for the dramatic performance gains of approximate methods, making previously infeasible similarity search applications practical at scale.

What Sets Vector DBs Apart

In my experience implementing these systems, these capabilities really make vector databases shine:

Tunable accuracy-performance tradeoffs: The ability to adjust index parameters to balance search speed against result precision
Multi-vector record support: Storing multiple embedding vectors per item to represent different aspects or modalities
Hybrid search capabilities: Combining vector similarity with traditional filtering for precise results
Distance metric flexibility: Supporting different similarity measures for different embedding types
Metadata filtering: Narrowing results based on traditional attributes alongside vector similarity

Recent innovations have further expanded their capabilities:

Sparse-dense hybrid search: Combining traditional keyword matching strengths with semantic understanding
Cross-encoder reranking: Refining initial vector search results with more computationally intensive models
Serverless scaling: Automatically adjusting resources based on query and indexing loads
Multi-stage retrieval pipelines: Orchestrating complex retrieval flows with filtering and reranking stages

Zilliz Cloud and Milvus: Leading the Vector Database Ecosystem

Among the growing ecosystem of vector database solutions, Zilliz Cloud and the open-source Milvus project have emerged as significant players:

Milvus is a widely-adopted open-source vector database that has gained popularity among developers building AI applications. Created to handle vector similarity search at scale, it provides the foundation for many production systems in areas ranging from recommendation engines to image search. The project has a strong community behind it and is designed with performance and scalability in mind.

Zilliz Cloud is the managed service version of Milvus, offering the same core functionality without the operational complexity. For development teams looking to implement vector search capabilities without dedicating resources to database management, Zilliz Cloud provides a streamlined path to production. This cloud-native approach aligns with modern development practices where teams increasingly prefer to consume databases as services rather than managing the underlying infrastructure themselves.

Popular Use Cases: Vector Databases

Vector databases are transforming various industries with their ability to power similarity-based applications:

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG): Vector databases connect language models with relevant information sources. Users can ask complex questions like "What were our Q2 sales results in Europe?" and receive accurate answers drawn directly from internal documents—ensuring responses are factual and up-to-date.
Semantic Search: Vector databases enable natural language search that understands user intent rather than just matching keywords. Users can search with conversational queries like "affordable vacation spots for families" and receive semantically relevant results, even when these exact words don't appear in the content.
Recommendation Systems: E-commerce platforms, streaming services, and content platforms use vector databases to deliver personalized recommendations based on semantic similarity rather than just collaborative filtering. This approach reduces the "cold start" problem for new items and can better explain why recommendations are being made.
Image and Visual Search: Retailers and visual platforms use vector databases to enable search-by-image functionality. Users can upload a photo to find visually similar products, artwork, or designs—particularly valuable in fashion, interior design, and creative fields.
Anomaly Detection: Security and monitoring systems leverage vector databases to identify unusual patterns that don't match expected behaviors. This is particularly valuable for fraud detection, network security, and manufacturing quality control.

Document Databases: Flexibility for Modern Applications

Architectural Foundations

Document databases like MongoDB, Couchbase, and Firestore are built around a fundamentally different concept: storing data in flexible, self-contained documents (typically JSON or BSON) without requiring a predefined schema. Their architecture generally includes:

Collection-based organization that groups related documents
Flexible schema validation that can be as strict or loose as needed
Indexing systems that support fast lookups on any field
Query engines optimized for traversing nested document structures
Distribution mechanisms that partition and replicate documents across nodes

The key insight: by relaxing some of the constraints of relational databases (particularly rigid schemas and normalization requirements), document databases achieve tremendous flexibility and developer productivity for applications with complex, evolving data models.

What Sets Document DBs Apart

From my experience building applications with document databases, these capabilities make them particularly valuable:

Schema flexibility: The ability to evolve data models without migrations and to handle heterogeneous documents in the same collection
Native support for nested data: Efficiently storing and querying complex, hierarchical data structures
Developer-friendly data models: Working with data in the same JSON-like format used throughout the application stack
Horizontal scaling: Distributing data across multiple nodes through sharding
Rich query capabilities: Supporting advanced operations on complex document structures

Recent innovations have further enhanced document databases:

Distributed ACID transactions: Maintaining consistency guarantees across sharded clusters
Real-time synchronization: Enabling collaborative applications with change streams and real-time listeners
GraphQL integration: Simplifying API development with declarative data fetching
Time-to-live (TTL) indexes: Automatically expiring documents after a specified period
Aggregation pipelines: Supporting sophisticated data transformations and analytics

Popular Use Cases: Document Databases

Document databases excel in numerous scenarios where data flexibility and developer productivity are paramount:

Content Management Systems: Media organizations and publishers use document databases to store articles, posts, and multimedia content with varying structures and metadata. The schema flexibility allows different content types to coexist in the same database while supporting rich queries across all content.
User Profiles and Preferences: Applications with complex user data leverage document databases to store profiles with nested preferences, activity histories, and variable attributes. This approach simplifies personalization features and adapts easily as user data requirements evolve.
Product Catalogs: E-commerce platforms use document databases to manage product information with varying attributes across different categories. A single collection can store everything from clothing with size and material attributes to electronics with technical specifications, all queryable through a consistent interface.
Mobile Applications: Document databases power mobile app backends, where offline-first capabilities and data synchronization are critical. Their flexible schema adapts easily to client-side data models and version changes without requiring complex migrations.
IoT Applications: Internet of Things systems use document databases to store device data with varying telemetry formats. The schema flexibility accommodates different device types and firmware versions, while indexing capabilities support queries across the entire device fleet.
Event Logging and Analytics: Applications use document databases to capture complex event data with variable structures. The ability to store nested event details and metadata simplifies both storage and analysis of user behavior and system events.

Head-to-Head Comparison: Vector DB vs Document DB


Feature	Vector Databases (Milvus, Zilliz Cloud)	Document Databases (MongoDB, Couchbase)	Why It Matters
Data Model	High-dimensional vectors with optional metadata	Flexible, schema-less JSON-like documents with nested structures	Determines how you represent your domain concepts and what operations are efficient
Query Patterns	Similarity search, k-NN, range queries	Exact match, range filters, nested field access	Defines the types of questions you can efficiently ask of your data
Primary Use	Finding similar items, semantic relationships	Storing and retrieving complex, hierarchical data	Aligns database strengths with your core application needs
Scalability	Horizontal scaling optimized for search workloads	Horizontal scaling through sharding and replication	Impacts how your database grows with your application
Write Patterns	Optimized for batch operations, slower individual updates	Fast individual document inserts and updates	Affects your application's data ingestion architecture
Read Patterns	Approximate nearest neighbor searches	Precise lookups and filters on document fields	Influences query performance and accuracy tradeoffs
Schema Evolution	Limited flexibility, vectors must maintain dimensions	High flexibility, documents can evolve without migrations	Determines how easily your data model can change over time
Query Language	Vector-specific APIs with similarity functions	Rich query DSLs with support for complex document traversal	Affects developer learning curve and query expressiveness
Development Experience	Specialized for AI and similarity use cases	General-purpose with broad framework support	Impacts developer productivity and recruiting requirements
Ecosystem Maturity	Newer, rapidly evolving	Well-established with extensive tooling	Influences available resources, community support, and stability

Vector Databases In Action: Real-World Success Stories

Vector databases shine in these use cases:

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) for Enterprise Knowledge

A global consulting firm implemented a RAG system using Zilliz Cloud to power their internal knowledge platform. They converted millions of documents, presentations, and project reports into embeddings stored in a vector database. When consultants ask questions, the system retrieves the most relevant context from their knowledge base and passes it to a large language model to generate accurate, contextually relevant answers.

This approach dramatically improved knowledge discovery, reduced research time by 65%, and ensured responses were grounded in the firm's actual experience and methodologies rather than generic LLM outputs. The vector database was critical in enabling real-time retrieval across massive document collections while maintaining sub-second query response times.

See more RAG case studies:

Agentic RAG for Complex Workflows

Agentic RAG is an advanced RAG framework that enhances the traditional RAG framework by incorporating intelligent agent capabilities. A healthcare technology provider built an agentic RAG system that uses vector search to power a clinical decision support tool. The system stores medical knowledge, treatment guidelines, and patient case histories as embeddings in a vector database. When physicians input complex patient scenarios, the agentic system:

Decomposes the complex query into sub-questions
Performs targeted vector searches for each sub-question
Evaluates and synthesizes the retrieved information
Determines if additional searches are needed
Delivers a comprehensive, evidence-based response

This advanced implementation reduced clinical decision time by 43% and improved treatment recommendation accuracy by 28% in validation studies. The vector database's ability to perform multiple rapid similarity searches with different contexts was essential for the agent's multi-step reasoning process.

The DeepSearcher, built by Zilliz Engineers, is a prime example of agentic RAG and is also a local, open-source alternative to OpenAI’s Deep Research. What sets DeepSearcher apart is its unique combination of advanced reasoning models, sophisticated search features, and an integrated research assistant. By leveraging Milvus (a high-performance vector database built by Zilliz) for local data integration, it delivers faster and more relevant search results while allowing easy model swapping for customized experiences.

Semantic Search Beyond Keywords

A media company replaced their traditional search functionality with a vector database-powered approach, allowing users to search their content library with natural language queries like "inspirational stories about overcoming obstacles" or "funny interviews with celebrities." Their vector database indexed embeddings of articles, videos, and podcast transcripts.

The implementation increased search relevance by 45%, doubled the average time users spent on the site, and significantly improved content discovery for their long-tail content—all while reducing the computational resources required compared to their previous search infrastructure.

See more semantic search case studies:

AI-Powered Image Search

A retail client implemented visual search using a vector database to store embeddings of their product catalog images. Customers could now upload pictures or screenshots to find visually similar products—something that was practically impossible with their previous search infrastructure.

This capability drove a 28% increase in mobile conversions and opened entirely new purchase pathways, particularly for fashion and home décor categories where visual similarity often matters more than text descriptions.

See more image search case studies:

Document Databases in Action: Real-World Success Stories

Document databases excel in these scenarios:

E-commerce Product Catalog Transformation

An online retailer migrated their product catalog from a relational database to a document database to accommodate their rapidly expanding product categories. Each product category required different attributes—apparel needed size and material properties, electronics needed technical specifications, and home goods needed dimensional information.

The document database allowed them to store all products in a single collection while supporting category-specific attributes without schema changes. This flexibility reduced development time for new product categories by 70% and simplified their inventory management system. Query performance for product filtering and faceted search improved by 3x compared to their previous normalized relational design.

Content Management System Evolution

A media company built their content platform on a document database to support diverse content types—articles, videos, podcasts, and interactive features—each with different metadata requirements. The schema flexibility allowed editors to add new content formats without requiring developer intervention or database migrations.

The document database's nested structure naturally mapped to their content hierarchy, with each piece containing sections, references, and related items. This approach reduced content management complexity and enabled them to launch new content formats 4x faster than their previous system. Their API layer became simpler as well, as the JSON documents mapped directly to their frontend data needs.

Mobile App Backend Simplification

A social fitness app used a document database to power their mobile backend, storing user profiles, workout data, and social interactions. The flexible schema adapted easily to their rapid iteration cycle, where new features regularly introduced different data requirements.

The document database's native support for geospatial data simplified location-based features like nearby workout partners and running routes. Most importantly, their development velocity increased—new features that previously took weeks to implement could now be shipped in days because schema changes didn't require complex migrations.

Benchmarking Your Vector Search Solutions on Your Own

VectorDBBench is an open-source benchmarking tool designed for users who require high-performance data storage and retrieval systems, particularly vector databases. This tool allows users to test and compare the performance of different vector database systems using their own datasets and determine the most suitable one for their use cases. Using VectorDBBench, users can make informed decisions based on the actual vector database performance rather than relying on marketing claims or anecdotal evidence.

VectorDBBench is written in Python and licensed under the MIT open-source license, meaning anyone can freely use, modify, and distribute it. The tool is actively maintained by a community of developers committed to improving its features and performance.

Download VectorDBBench.

Check out the VectorDBBench Leaderboard for a quick look at the performance of mainstream vector databases.

Decision Framework: Choosing the Right Database Architecture

After helping numerous organizations make this decision, I've developed this practical framework:

Choose a Vector Database When:

AI-powered similarity search is your core value proposition - Your application's primary purpose revolves around finding related items based on semantic or perceptual similarity
Search quality is business-critical - Even small improvements in search relevance translate to measurable business outcomes
You're working with high-dimensional embeddings - Your vectors have hundreds or thousands of dimensions from modern embedding models
You need sophisticated vector operations - Your application requires advanced nearest-neighbor search, clustering, or vector math operations
Vector search performance is the bottleneck - Query latency for vector operations directly impacts user experience

Choose a Document Database When:

Data model flexibility is paramount - Your application deals with heterogeneous data types or rapidly evolving schemas
Nested data structures are common - Your domain naturally involves complex, hierarchical data relationships
Developer productivity is a priority - Your team needs to iterate quickly on data models without complex migrations
Document-oriented workflows dominate - Your application primarily creates, reads, updates, and deletes entire documents
JSON is your native exchange format - Your APIs and client applications already work with JSON-like data structures

Consider a Hybrid Approach When:

You need both semantic search and complex document storage - Your application requires both the similarity capabilities of vector databases and the flexibility of document databases
Your data has natural separation between vectors and documents - Some components of your system work primarily with embeddings while others work with rich document structures
Performance requirements differ across workloads - Vector search needs may have different scaling characteristics than document storage needs
You can manage the operational complexity - Your team has the expertise to maintain multiple database systems effectively

Consider Document DB with Vector Capabilities When:

Document storage is your primary need with occasional vector queries - The vector functionality is supplemental to your core document-based operations
Operational simplicity trumps specialized performance - Managing a single database system is a higher priority than maximizing query performance
Your vector search needs are modest - Both in terms of collection size and dimensionality
Your queries frequently combine document filters with similarity - You need to seamlessly integrate document-based filtering with vector similarity search

Implementation Realities: What I Wish I Knew Earlier

After implementing both database types across multiple organizations, here are practical considerations that often get overlooked:

Resource Planning

Vector databases can be surprisingly memory-hungry, often requiring 2-4x more RAM than you might initially estimate based on raw vector dimensions
Document databases can have unexpected storage overhead for small documents due to metadata and indexing requirements
Scaling considerations differ fundamentally: vector databases often scale with vector dimensions and collection size, while document databases scale with document complexity and query patterns

Development Experience

Query paradigms are fundamentally different, requiring distinct mental models from your development team
Error handling varies significantly between these database types, with different failure modes requiring specialized monitoring
The learning curve for vector similarity concepts can be steep for teams accustomed to traditional query operations

Operational Realities

Backup strategies differ substantially due to the different data models and update patterns
Monitoring requirements vary, with vector databases requiring attention to index performance metrics that don't exist in document databases
Update patterns impact operational procedures: document databases usually excel at individual updates, while vector databases often prefer batch operations

Conclusion: Choose the Right Tool, But Stay Flexible

The choice between vector databases and document databases isn't about picking a winner—it's about matching your database architecture to your specific data characteristics and application requirements.

If your core use case involves finding similar items or semantic relationships, a vector database likely makes sense as your foundation. If your fundamental need is storing and querying flexible, hierarchical data with evolving schemas, a document database is probably your starting point.

The most sophisticated data architectures I've helped build don't shy away from specialized databases—they embrace them while creating clean interfaces that hide complexity from application developers. This approach gives you the performance benefits of specialized systems while maintaining development velocity.

Whatever path you choose, the key is building with enough flexibility to evolve as both your requirements and the database landscape continue to change. The convergence between vector and document capabilities is just beginning, and the most successful architectures will be those that can adapt to incorporate the best of both worlds.

Updated on Mar 31, 2025

Chloe Williams
Chloe Williams is a technical writer at Zilliz.

Content

Start Free, Scale Easily

Try the fully-managed vector database built for your GenAI applications.

Try Zilliz Cloud for Free

Share this article

Keep Reading

Knowledge Injection in LLMs: Fine-Tuning and RAG

Explore knowledge injection techniques like fine-tuning and RAG. Compare their effectiveness in improving accuracy, knowledge retention, and task performance.

Introducing Milvus 2.5: Built-in Full-Text Search, Advanced Query Optimization, and More 🚀

We're thrilled to announce the release of Milvus 2.5, a significant step in our journey to build the world's most complete solution for all search workloads.

Mixture-of-Agents (MoA): How Collective Intelligence Elevates LLM Performance

Mixture-of-Agents (MoA) is a framework where multiple specialized LLMs, or "agents," collaborate to solve tasks by leveraging their unique strengths.