Blog
Qdrant vs Deep LakeChoosing the Right Vector Database for Your AI Apps

Qdrant vs Deep LakeChoosing the Right Vector Database for Your AI Apps

Dec 10, 20248 min read

What is a Vector Database?

Before we compare Qdrant and Deep Lake, let's first explore the concept of vector databases.

A vector database is specifically designed to store and query high-dimensional vectors, which are numerical representations of unstructured data. These vectors encode complex information, such as the semantic meaning of text, the visual features of images, or product attributes. By enabling efficient similarity searches, vector databases play a pivotal role in AI applications, allowing for more advanced data analysis and retrieval.

Common use cases for vector databases include e-commerce product recommendations, content discovery platforms, anomaly detection in cybersecurity, medical image analysis, and natural language processing (NLP) tasks. They also play a crucial role in Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG), a technique that enhances the performance of large language models (LLMs) by providing external knowledge to reduce issues like AI hallucinations.

There are many types of vector databases available in the market, including:

Purpose-built vector databases such as Milvus, Zilliz Cloud (fully managed Milvus)
Vector search libraries such as Faiss and Annoy.
Lightweight vector databases such as Chroma and Milvus Lite.
Traditional databases with vector search add-ons capable of performing small-scale vector searches.

Qdrant is a purpose-built vector database. Deep Lake is a data lake optimized for vector embeddings with vector search capabilities as an add-on. This post compares their vector search capabilities.

Qdrant: Overview and Core Technology

Qdrant is a vector database for similarity search and machine learning. Built from the ground up for vector data, it’s the go to choice for AI developers. Qdrant optimizes performance and can handle high dimensional vector data which is key for many modern ML models.

One of the key strengths of Qdrant is its flexible data modeling. You can store and index not just vectors but also payload data associated with each vector. This means you can run complex queries that combine vector similarity with filtering on metadata, so you can have more powerful and nuanced search. Qdrant ensures data consistency with ACID compliant transactions even during concurrent operations.

Qdrant’s vector search is at the heart of the platform. It uses a custom version of the HNSW (Hierarchical Navigable Small World) algorithm for indexing which is efficient in high dimensional spaces. The Distance Matrix API allows to calculate efficiently pairwise distances between vectors, so it’s great for tasks like clustering and dimensionality reduction - even with thousands of vectors. For scenarios where precision matters more than speed, Qdrant also supports exact search and provides visual tools to explore vector relationships through the Graph UI.

What’s special about Qdrant is its query and optimization features. Its query language works seamlessly with vector search and supports complex operations including a powerful Facet API to aggregate and count unique values in the data. Memory optimization features like on-disk text and geo indexing allow to handle large scale deployments while keeping performance through intelligent caching. Qdrant has automatic sharding and replication for scalability and supports various data types and query conditions from string matching to numerical ranges and geo-locations. The scalar, product and binary quantization features can reduce memory usage and speed up search, especially for high dimensional vectors.

You can configure the trade off between search precision and performance with both approximate and exact matching depending on your use case. The architecture is designed for real world scenarios where vector search needs to be combined with filtering and aggregation, so it’s great for building practical AI applications.

Deep Lake: Overview and Core Technology

Deep Lake is a specialized database built for handling vector and multimedia data—such as images, audio, video, and other unstructured types—widely used in AI and machine learning. It functions as both a data lake and a vector store:

As a Data Lake: Deep Lake supports the storage and organization of unstructured data (images, audio, videos, text, and formats like NIfTI for medical imaging) in a version-controlled format. This setup enhances performance in deep learning tasks. It enables fast querying and visualization of datasets, making it easier to create high-quality training sets for AI models.
As a Vector Store: Deep Lake is designed for storing and searching vector embeddings and related metadata (e.g., text, JSON, images). Data can be stored locally, in your cloud environment, or on Deep Lake’s managed storage. It integrates seamlessly with tools like LangChain and LlamaIndex, simplifying the development of Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) applications.

Deep Lake uses the Hierarchical Navigable Small World (HNSW) index, based on the Hnswlib package with added optimizations, for Approximate Nearest Neighbor (ANN) search. This allows querying over 35 million embeddings in less than 1 second. Unique features include multi-threading for faster index creation and memory-efficient management to reduce RAM usage.

By default, Deep Lake uses linear embedding search for datasets with up to 100,000 rows. For larger datasets, it switches to ANN to balance accuracy and performance. The API allows users to adjust this threshold as needed.

Although Deep Lake’s index isn't used for combined attribute and vector searches (which currently rely on linear search), upcoming updates will address this limitation to improve its functionality further.

Deep Lake as a Vector Store: Deep Lake provides a robust solution for storing and searching vector embeddings and their associated metadata, including text, JSON, images, audio, and video files. You can store data locally, in your preferred cloud environment, or on Deep Lake's managed storage. Deep Lake also offers seamless integration with tools like LangChain and LlamaIndex, allowing developers to easily build Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) applications.

Key Differences

Search Methodology and Performance

Both Qdrant and Deep Lake use HNSW (Hierarchical Navigable Small World) for vector search, but they do it differently. Qdrant has a custom HNSW implementation with a Distance Matrix API for fast pairwise distance calculations. Deep Lake uses an optimized version of Hnswlib that can query over 35 million embeddings in under a second. Deep Lake automatically switches between linear search (for datasets under 100,000 rows) and approximate nearest neighbor search for larger datasets, while Qdrant lets you control this trade-off yourself.

Data Handling and Storage

The main difference is in their data handling approach. Qdrant is focused on vector data with associated payload metadata, good for applications that need combined vector similarity and metadata filtering. Deep Lake has broader data support - it handles not just vectors but also raw multimedia data like images, audio, and video. Deep Lake is a data lake and vector store with version control for unstructured data.

Scalability Features

Qdrant has built-in scaling features like automatic sharding and replication. It also has memory optimization through on-disk text and geo indexing. Deep Lake takes a different approach by providing flexible storage options - you can store data locally, in your own cloud, or use their managed storage. However Deep Lake currently uses linear search for combined attribute and vector searches which may impact performance at scale.

Integration and Use Cases

Deep Lake works well with AI development tools like LangChain and LlamaIndex so is good for RAG (Retrieval Augmented Generation) applications. It's designed for machine learning workflows, especially with multimedia data. Qdrant also supports AI applications but is more focused on a flexible query language that combines vector search with traditional filtering and aggregation.

When to Choose Each Technology

Choose Qdrant for applications that need strong vector search combined with complex filtering and aggregation operations. It's ideal for production environments where you need to scale vector search across large datasets while maintaining quick response times. The platform shines in use cases like semantic search engines, recommendation systems, and similarity matching where you need to combine vector search with metadata filtering. Qdrant's memory optimization features, automatic sharding, and flexible query language make it particularly suitable for applications that need to grow from thousands to millions of vectors while keeping search performance high.

Choose Deep Lake when your AI applications work primarily with multimedia data and you need version control for your datasets. It's the better option for machine learning workflows that involve training data management, especially when dealing with images, audio, video, or specialized formats like medical imaging. Deep Lake works well for RAG (Retrieval Augmented Generation) applications through its LangChain and LlamaIndex integrations, and its flexible storage options let you keep data locally or in the cloud. It's particularly strong for teams that need both vector search and data lake capabilities in one platform.

Conclusion

Qdrant and Deep Lake excel in different areas - Qdrant offers robust vector search with strong filtering and scaling capabilities, while Deep Lake provides comprehensive multimedia data handling with version control. Your choice should depend on your specific needs: pick Qdrant if you need production-ready vector search with complex filtering and built-in scaling features, or choose Deep Lake if you're working with multimedia data and need both vector search and data lake capabilities. Consider your data types, expected growth, and whether you need features like version control or multimedia support when making your decision.

Read this to get an overview of Qdrant and Deep Lake but to evaluate these you need to evaluate based on your use case. One tool that can help with that is VectorDBBench, an open-source benchmarking tool for vector database comparison. In the end, thorough benchmarking with your own datasets and query patterns will be key to making a decision between these two powerful but different approaches to vector search in distributed database systems.

Using Open-source VectorDBBench to Evaluate and Compare Vector Databases on Your Own

VectorDBBench is an open-source benchmarking tool for users who need high-performance data storage and retrieval systems, especially vector databases. This tool allows users to test and compare different vector database systems like Milvus and Zilliz Cloud (the managed Milvus) using their own datasets and find the one that fits their use cases. With VectorDBBench, users can make decisions based on actual vector database performance rather than marketing claims or hearsay.

VectorDBBench is written in Python and licensed under the MIT open-source license, meaning anyone can freely use, modify, and distribute it. The tool is actively maintained by a community of developers committed to improving its features and performance.

Download VectorDBBench from its GitHub repository to reproduce our benchmark results or obtain performance results on your own datasets.
Take a quick look at the performance of mainstream vector databases on the VectorDBBench Leaderboard.
Read the following blogs to learn more about vector database evaluation.

Further Resources about VectorDB, GenAI, and ML

Chloe Williams
Chloe Williams is a technical writer at Zilliz.

Content

Start Free, Scale Easily

Try the fully-managed vector database built for your GenAI applications.

Try Zilliz Cloud for Free

Share this article

The Definitive Guide to Choosing a Vector Database

Overwhelmed by all the options? Learn key features to look for & how to evaluate with your own data. Choose with confidence.

Get the Free Guide