Couchbase vs Qdrant Choosing the Right Vector Database for Your AI Apps
What is a Vector Database?
Before we compare Couchbase and Qdrant, let's first explore the concept of vector databases.
A vector database is specifically designed to store and query high-dimensional vectors, which are numerical representations of unstructured data. These vectors encode complex information, such as the semantic meaning of text, the visual features of images, or product attributes. By enabling efficient similarity searches, vector databases play a pivotal role in AI applications, allowing for more advanced data analysis and retrieval.
Common use cases for vector databases include e-commerce product recommendations, content discovery platforms, anomaly detection in cybersecurity, medical image analysis, and natural language processing (NLP) tasks. They also play a crucial role in Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG), a technique that enhances the performance of large language models (LLMs) by providing external knowledge to reduce issues like AI hallucinations.
There are many types of vector databases available in the market, including:
- Purpose-built vector databases such as Milvus, Zilliz Cloud (fully managed Milvus)
- Vector search libraries such as Faiss and Annoy.
- Lightweight vector databases such as Chroma and Milvus Lite.
- Traditional databases with vector search add-ons capable of performing small-scale vector searches.
Couchbase is a distributed multi-model NoSQL document-oriented database with vector search as an add-on and Qdrant is a purpose-built vector database. This post compares their vector search capabilities.
Couchbase: Overview and Core Technology
Couchbase is a distributed, open-source, NoSQL database that can be used to build applications for cloud, mobile, AI, and edge computing. It combines the strengths of relational databases with the versatility of JSON. Couchbase also provides the flexibility to implement vector search despite not having native support for vector indexes. Developers can store vector embeddings—numerical representations generated by machine learning models—within Couchbase documents as part of their JSON structure. These vectors can be used in similarity search use cases, such as recommendation systems or retrieval-augmented generation both based on semantic search, where finding data points close to each other in a high-dimensional space is important.
One approach to enabling vector search in Couchbase is by leveraging Full Text Search (FTS). While FTS is typically designed for text-based search, it can be adapted to handle vector searches by converting vector data into searchable fields. For instance, vectors can be tokenized into text-like data, allowing FTS to index and search based on those tokens. This can facilitate approximate vector search, providing a way to query documents with vectors that are close in similarity.
Alternatively, developers can store the raw vector embeddings in Couchbase and perform the vector similarity calculations at the application level. This involves retrieving documents and computing metrics such as cosine similarity or Euclidean distance between vectors to identify the closest matches. This method allows Couchbase to serve as a storage solution for vectors while the application handles the mathematical comparison logic.
For more advanced use cases, some developers integrate Couchbase with specialized libraries or algorithms (like FAISS or HNSW) that enable efficient vector search. These integrations allow Couchbase to manage the document store while the external libraries perform the actual vector comparisons. In this way, Couchbase can still be part of a solution that supports vector search.
By using these approaches, Couchbase can be adapted to handle vector search functionality, making it a flexible option for various AI and machine learning tasks that rely on similarity searches.
Qdrant: Overview and Core Technology
Qdrant is a vector database built specifically for similarity search and machine learning applications. It's designed from the ground up to handle vector data efficiently, making it a top choice for developers working on AI-driven projects. Qdrant excels in performance optimization and can work with high-dimensional vector data, which is crucial for many modern machine learning models.
One of Qdrant's key strengths is its flexible data modeling. It allows you to store and index not just vectors, but also payload data associated with each vector. This means you can run complex queries that combine vector similarity with filtering based on metadata, enabling more powerful and nuanced search capabilities. Qdrant ensures data consistency with ACID-compliant transactions, even during concurrent operations.
Qdrant's vector search capabilities are a core part of its architecture. It uses a custom version of the HNSW (Hierarchical Navigable Small World) algorithm for indexing, known for its efficiency in high-dimensional spaces. This allows for fast approximate nearest neighbor search, which is essential for many AI applications. For scenarios where precision trumps speed, Qdrant also supports exact search methods.
What sets Qdrant apart is its query language and API design. It offers a rich set of filtering and query options that work seamlessly with vector search, allowing for complex, multi-stage queries. This makes it particularly good for applications that need to perform semantic search alongside traditional filtering. Qdrant also includes features like automatic sharding and replication to help you scale as your data and query load grow. It supports a variety of data types and query conditions, including string matching, numerical ranges, and geo-locations. Qdrant's scalar, product, and binary quantization features can significantly reduce memory usage and boost search performance, especially for high-dimensional vectors.
Key Differences
If you’re choosing between Couchbase and Qdrant for vector search, it’s mostly dependent on your use case, existing infrastructure and priorities. Here’s a breakdown of the main differences to help you decide.
Search Methodology
Couchbase: Couchbase doesn’t support vector indexes out of the box but has workarounds. You can adapt its Full Text Search (FTS) for approximate vector search by tokenizing vectors into searchable fields or rely on application side computations (e.g. cosine similarity). Integration with external libraries like FAISS enables more advanced capabilities but the vector search isn’t as smooth or efficient as dedicated tools.
Qdrant: Qdrant is built for vector search. Its architecture is optimized for high-dimensional similarity searches, with algorithms like HNSW for fast approximate nearest neighbor (ANN) retrieval. It also supports exact search when precision is important. So if vector search is at the heart of your application.
Data Handling
Couchbase: Supports structured, semi-structured and unstructured data with a document oriented JSON model. Vectors can be stored alongside metadata in JSON documents for applications that require complex data representations.
Qdrant: While focused on vector data, Qdrant allows you to store associated metadata (payload) alongside vectors. Its query capabilities combine vector similarity with metadata based filtering so it’s good for applications that require both semantic and structured filtering.
Scalability and Performance
Couchbase: Built for general purpose NoSQL workloads, Couchbase scales horizontally with features like auto-sharding and replication. But vector search requires additional tools or computation layers which can introduce performance bottlenecks for large datasets.
Qdrant: Designed to handle large scale vector data, Qdrant has auto-sharding and replication out of the box. It uses quantization techniques to reduce memory usage so it’s fast even with big datasets.
Flexibility and Customization
Couchbase: Flexible data modeling and query design so it’s a good choice for developers dealing with different types of data. But since it doesn’t have built-in vector search features developers have to implement custom solutions or rely on external integrations.
Qdrant: Specializes in vector search but also allows for a lot of customization through its APIs. Its query language allows to combine vector similarity with traditional filters so it’s flexible without sacrificing performance.
Integration and Ecosystem
Couchbase: Integrates with a lot of tools and frameworks, cloud-native environments, mobile platforms, edge computing use cases. It’s versatile so it’s good for applications that require a broad ecosystem.
Qdrant: Qdrant’s integrations are focused on machine learning workflows. It supports frameworks like TensorFlow, PyTorch, ONNX for embedding generation and libraries like FAISS, ScaNN for advanced search.
Ease of Use
Couchbase: Has comprehensive documentation and a familiar developer experience for those who are used to NoSQL databases. But vector search implementation can be complex since you need additional tooling or custom code.
Qdrant: Intuitive and developer friendly, APIs are tailored for vector search use cases. Setup is simple and the learning curve is minimal for developers who are familiar with embedding based workflows.
Cost
Couchbase: May require more operational costs if you integrate external libraries or build custom solutions for vector search. Managed services can mitigate some of the complexity but still have added cost for storage and computation.
Qdrant: As a vector database, Qdrant is optimized for its use case, so it can save you money for applications that rely heavily on vector search. Managed service cost is aligned with its feature set.
Security
Couchbase: Full security features, encryption, role-based access control, integration with enterprise authentication systems like LDAP, Kerberos.
Qdrant: Basic security features: authentication, encryption, access control
When to Choose Couchbase
Couchbase is best suited for use cases where general-purpose NoSQL functionality is needed alongside vector search capabilities. Its ability to store structured, semi-structured, and unstructured data makes it a great fit for applications requiring complex data models and diverse queries. If your project involves large-scale distributed data or you already use Couchbase for other workflows, its extensibility allows you to add vector search functionality without overhauling your existing system. Couchbase is especially useful for teams that prioritize flexibility and can invest in customizing their vector search implementation or integrating with external libraries like FAISS.
When to Choose Qdrant
Qdrant is the better option when vector search is a core requirement, especially for AI and machine learning applications. It excels at managing and querying high-dimensional vector data with speed and precision, making it ideal for use cases like recommendation systems, semantic search, or multimedia retrieval. Its native support for vector embeddings and flexible filtering capabilities make it a natural fit for projects requiring a tight integration between vector similarity and metadata filtering. Developers looking for an out-of-the-box solution with minimal setup and a focus on performance will find Qdrant to be an excellent choice.
Conclusion
Couchbase shines as a multi-purpose NoSQL database with the versatility to support a range of workloads, including vector search through external tools or custom solutions. On the other hand, Qdrant's focused design and native vector search capabilities make it a specialized solution for machine learning and AI-driven applications. The choice between these technologies ultimately depends on your use case. If you need a general-purpose database with occasional vector search, Couchbase is a solid option. However, if vector search is central to your application, Qdrant’s optimized performance and ease of use make it the better fit.
Read this to get an overview of Couchbase and Qdrant but to evaluate these you need to evaluate based on your use case. One tool that can help with that is VectorDBBench, an open-source benchmarking tool for vector database comparison. In the end, thorough benchmarking with your own datasets and query patterns will be key to making a decision between these two powerful but different approaches to vector search in distributed database systems.
Using Open-source VectorDBBench to Evaluate and Compare Vector Databases on Your Own
VectorDBBench is an open-source benchmarking tool for users who need high-performance data storage and retrieval systems, especially vector databases. This tool allows users to test and compare different vector database systems like Milvus and Zilliz Cloud (the managed Milvus) using their own datasets and find the one that fits their use cases. With VectorDBBench, users can make decisions based on actual vector database performance rather than marketing claims or hearsay.
VectorDBBench is written in Python and licensed under the MIT open-source license, meaning anyone can freely use, modify, and distribute it. The tool is actively maintained by a community of developers committed to improving its features and performance.
Download VectorDBBench from its GitHub repository to reproduce our benchmark results or obtain performance results on your own datasets.
Take a quick look at the performance of mainstream vector databases on the VectorDBBench Leaderboard.
Read the following blogs to learn more about vector database evaluation.
Further Resources about VectorDB, GenAI, and ML
Chloe WilliamsChloe Williams is a technical writer at Zilliz.
- What is a Vector Database?
- Couchbase: Overview and Core Technology
- Qdrant: Overview and Core Technology
- Key Differences
- Using Open-source VectorDBBench to Evaluate and Compare Vector Databases on Your Own
- Further Resources about VectorDB, GenAI, and ML
Content
Start Free, Scale Easily
Try the fully-managed vector database built for your GenAI applications.
Try Zilliz Cloud for FreeThe Definitive Guide to Choosing a Vector Database
Overwhelmed by all the options? Learn key features to look for & how to evaluate with your own data. Choose with confidence.