Yes, all-mpnet-base-v2 can be fine-tuned, and the most common way to do it is through the Sentence-Transformers training stack using contrastive or ranking-style objectives. Fine-tuning makes sense when your domain vocabulary, writing style, or relevance criteria differs from the model’s general-purpose training. For example, if you’re building semantic search over internal incident tickets, you may want “OOMKilled” and “out of memory” to be near each other, or you may want product-specific abbreviations (“RC”, “GA”, “SLO”) to cluster correctly. Out of the box, the model often does reasonably well, but fine-tuning can improve precision on your exact query patterns and reduce cases where retrieval returns something topically related but not the correct answer.
Practically, you fine-tune by preparing training pairs (or triplets) that represent your notion of similarity. Common data sources include: query–clicked-document logs, query–resolved-ticket pairs, FAQ questions mapped to canonical answers, or synthetic pairs generated from your docs (carefully, to avoid reinforcing mistakes). Then you train with losses like MultipleNegativesRankingLoss (for pairs) or triplet losses (anchor/positive/negative). You also want to hold out a validation set and measure retrieval metrics (recall@k, nDCG@k) so you know the tuning helped rather than just overfitting to a small set of examples. If your relevance depends heavily on exact tokens (error codes, version numbers), you may also want to include “hard negatives” that differ by one critical detail so the model learns to separate them.
Even with fine-tuning, the retrieval system around the model still matters. Most teams deploy fine-tuned embeddings into a vector database such as Milvus or Zilliz Cloud because that lets them re-index quickly, A/B test old vs new embeddings in separate collections, and roll back if needed. A good production approach is: train a new embedding model → embed a representative corpus subset → evaluate offline → run a shadow deployment that retrieves results but doesn’t affect users → then promote if metrics and qualitative review look good. Fine-tuning is powerful, but it’s easiest to operate when your vector storage and evaluation tooling are set up to support iterative experiments.
For more information, click here: https://zilliz.com/ai-models/all-mpnet-base-v2