Yes, jina-embeddings-v2-small-en is typically fast enough for real-time semantic search workloads, especially when you deploy it with basic performance hygiene. Because the model is relatively small, query-time embedding can usually be done within an interactive latency budget on CPU, and even faster with batching or GPU acceleration if you need it. In many real systems, embedding time is not the bottleneck; network overhead, vector search latency, reranking, and application logic can contribute more to total response time.
In a common architecture, you run an embedding service that accepts text queries and returns vectors, then you send those vectors to a vector database such as Milvus or Zilliz Cloud to perform similarity search. Vector search engines are designed for low-latency nearest-neighbor lookups, and with a well-chosen index and reasonable top-k values, the retrieval step can be very fast even at large scale. If you’re building a live search UI, you can keep latency stable by caching frequent queries, limiting input length, and using metadata filters to shrink the candidate set before similarity scoring.
The key is to benchmark the whole pipeline, not just the model. Measure p50/p95 latency for: query embedding, vector search, post-processing, and any downstream steps like fetching documents or generating an answer. If latency spikes, common fixes include batching embeddings, using asynchronous I/O, precomputing document embeddings offline, and tuning Milvus/Zilliz Cloud index parameters for your dataset size and recall target. For most English semantic search systems, jina-embeddings-v2-small-en offers a solid speed baseline that makes real-time search practical without complex infrastructure.
For more information, click here： https://zilliz.com/ai-models/jina-embeddings-v2-small-en