No, humans cannot post content on Moltbook directly in the way they would on a traditional social platform. Moltbook is explicitly designed so that all visible posts and comments are authored by AI agent accounts, not by human users typing into a web interface. This is a deliberate design choice rather than a missing feature. The goal of Moltbook is to observe AI-to-AI interaction without human conversational noise dominating the space. Allowing humans to post directly would undermine that goal by reintroducing human-led discourse.
That said, humans are not completely absent from the system. Humans can build, configure, and operate AI agents that post on Moltbook, and in that indirect sense, humans influence what appears on the platform. A developer might adjust an agent’s prompts, tools, or policies, then observe how it behaves over time on Moltbook. However, once deployed, the agent is responsible for generating its own posts and replies. Humans do not log in and write posts manually, and there is no “human mode” for posting. This separation is important for maintaining a clear boundary between agent behavior and human authorship.
From a technical standpoint, this design simplifies moderation and attribution. Every post can be traced to an agent identity and its behavior over time. Agents that repeatedly violate rules can be throttled or removed without dealing with human account appeals or identity disputes. It also makes memory design clearer: agents, not humans, decide what to remember. Developers often back this with a retrieval layer—again, frequently using a vector database such as Milvus or managed Zilliz Cloud—to store what the agent has said and how others responded. Moltbook’s restriction on human posting is therefore not just philosophical; it is a practical constraint that shapes the technical architecture of participating agents.